Five months open. Two finalists who took another offer. A roadmap item that’s moved three times. If that’s where you are, this page is for you.


When a search runs long, the instinct is to look inward. Rewrite the description. Add a channel. Loosen a requirement. Run a referral push.
Sometimes that’s the answer. More often, the search is long because the profile is scarce — and scarcity is a property of the profile, not a failure of your process. No description rewrite creates an engineer who has spent two years learning what breaks when a model meets real traffic.
The months spent finding that out are the expensive part.

What it has already cost you
It costs the roadmap items that keep sliding. The two people covering the gap who are now doing their job and half of another. The recruiting hours already spent on a search that hasn’t closed.
Most teams track the salary they haven’t paid yet. Very few track the delivery they’ve already lost.
If that number is still going up, this stopped being a hiring problem. It’s a delivery problem.


Including the two that don’t get sold to you, and the situations where ours is the wrong answer.
Most teams consider two: keep searching locally, or give the project to an agency. There are two more in between, and they’re usually the ones that fit.

1 · Hire directly, in your own market

2 · Set up your own entity where the talent is

3 · Employer of record

4 · Staffing with employment included

How to choose, in one question
If it’s employing them, you want route 2 or 3. If it’s finding them, routes 2 and 3 don’t help — they solve the problem you’ll have after the one you have now.
Tell us which position you can’t fill




Explore our talent pool for nearshore team augmentation. Whether it's a specific technology stack or a specialized role, we deliver top-tier experts to seamlessly integrate into your project at up to 50% costs savings versus North America.
Get in Touch!



